didn't rob hunter do a speech in english about "stuff" and one of his sub topics was "other stuff"
so yeah now my semester has finished. HSFY, man it was hard. it's been quite a humbling process I think, it's giving me a whole lot of new perspectives on a hell of a lot of things I must say. And I think some of this also comes just as you get older you know. And I only have half an hour to flesh out these points as then my friend will be over and surely enough I wont want to spend time on this later, as the case always is.
science I think I finally understand what science really is now, and consequently I have gained a lot of respect for it, and for scientists in general and I think the basic tenets of the scientific method are such a strong foundation for always putting the knowledge first and egos second. "No hypothesis can be proved true, it can only be proven false" this was a correction of a mistake I had made in a question about hypothesis in cell biology. It's a statement which has a lot more depth to it than is initially apparent.
I think it's sad that a lot of people don't understand what science is (maybe that's just my church background speaking) and more importantly what it isn't. I used to "mock" the idea that science changed it's objective "truth" about from year to year, but now I understand why, and a mocking attitude towards it comes purely out of ignorance
I like life here in Dunedin. I do have to admit a lot of our awesome experience comes from living in a very above average apartment which is super close to town. I mean, we don't pay a lot, but I think we just really got lucky on this one. Thanks Alice for your hardwork on looking and also being an intensive care nurse which I think was the selling point to the landlord! But I've made awesome friends here at Otago, a real varied bunch, I give a lot of credit to Bridging Chemistry, to the random slice of student population that was - seems like most of the mature students (is >22 really "mature"?) were on it basically. It seems like the city is a lot less superficial than Christchurch; and it comes from a large student population I think, and I really like it. Admittedly being a student plays a large part in this, unfortunately I don't think Alice has had quite the experience I've had, but it looks like everything might be turning around for her in some great and totally unexpected ways so yeah, I'm stoked for her.
Alice had actually left for almost 4 weeks, she was so sick of her job here and when she got this new job and a little over a month until it started she thought "why not go to Christchurch, do a job I know I love, and give Andrew some study space". It was pretty weird not having Alice with me, but the time flew, and I think I managed to live on my own pretty damn well; I led a simpler life for sure, but I did pretty well *cough* I also gained 4-5-6 kilos but that's completely my own fault so yeah. Actually that's pretty depressing considering I was down to only 2 kilos off what I weighed when I left HS and was in better physical condition than ever. I just noticed, that paragraph started off about my wife and ended up about me..
HSFY has kicked my ass. It's also kicked the ass of a number of my friends too. I mean, people tell you it's hard, but you just don't have a clue. I feel pretty OK about my subjects. I don't think they'll be good enough for pharmacy but the results have yet to come in and I have another semester to raise my average so I've still have a good showing. if I pass everything but fail to get into pharmacy, this year counts as a first year of a science degree, and I can reapply to pharmacy after another year, so I think if that's the case I'll do botany, which would be awesome, but not my goal..
2 of the 4 papers were very hard, cell biology and chemistry, I found cell biology harder than chemistry, but maybe that's just the way I am, I know a lot of people really struggle with chemistry. Also, the final exam for Chem191 seemed so much harder than all the exams from previous years. I guess though if everyone is doing the same exam then everyones marks will be lower and so it evens out. I think physics seemed quite hard if you only went to to lectures, but looking back, I think lecture time would have been better spent - man I'm cold, my breath is fogging and it's 11am inside - just practising physics and reading the relevant chapters, physics becomes really easy with practise, it's almost quite weird just how much easier. and human body system was relatively easy I thought compared to the rest of the papers, but very interesting and I have to say our immune system is unbelievably complex (seriously, you have no idea) but I finally understand it, for now.
There was a new chem text book this year, written primarily by one of the otago staff and I reckon it's rubbish. You'd think if it was written as an 100 level chem book by otago staff that it would somehow be relevant to the biggest 100 level chem paper at otago, but it's not. I barely used it. Also what really pisses me off, is that to get the answers for the questions in the book, you have to get an account at the publishers website, and get the answers from there. there are 2 things that annoy me about this:
the first is that on the website only the answers that your course coordinator has opened are available. if you for some reason wanted to study something that you weren't assigned to and wanted to practise questions, you can't, and what about people who buy the book for fun? (does anyone do this? I probably will for my kids but that's just me)
the second thing is that an account only comes with a new text book purchase (actually I guess you could purchase a new account for an old book) but it completely destroys the 2nd hand text book market, as if students are made of money - I guess it's just course related costs though so who care. Thankfully due to my smart skills - and this makes my first point rather pointless as it was all hearsay - I never activated my account, and since I barely used the text book and looks as good as new, I can sell my book 2nd hand. take that professor blackman and your moral-less publishers.
If only he knew that's why I liked my physics text book or the chem text book that Lisa lent me (they both rule, and if Lisa's book had organic in it I wouldn't have needed a new one!)
So yeah I spent my course related costs on a latop instead of text books anyway, after all, at heart I'm a massive computer nerd. And I have to say that I'm pretty impressed with laptops in general now. I honestly don't see a reason to buy a desktop computer unless you're a performance/gaming freak or you actually work at a desk for a job. It seems now that the technology has reached a point that most people can not only be content with a laptop, but actually happy with one. This one has replaced our DVD player and TV (in the sense that I only used the TV to watch DVDs on, I generally despise TV - unless it's on and then I'm drawn to it), it's freaking fast, has enough storage so that I've still got 55gb free and it's full of movies and episodes of TV shows. I know I just said I despise TV, but it's not necessarily the shows themselves, it's all the other baggage, ads, no choice in when to view and little choice in what at a particular time etc.
I also really like windows vista. I think a lot of people are put off just because it's microsoft, but it's really a nice step up from xp, I mean, mostly it's the same but there were a whole bunch of outdated aspects to xp, I mean, file copying was a joke. and now it's slightly better, and a bunch of other things. also that the computers of today can be fast and quiet and now that I've worked how to unleash and utilise some of Vistas abilities I have probably the sweetest setup I've ever had. And it didn't even cost all that much either
I think I've come to a point where I've realised that no political view is fundamentally flawed, they all have their good and bad points, just that any extreme hard-line view is wrong. for a short while I was "into" politics but now I've just realised that unless I give my life to it, I can't change anything other than talking to other people. I went to this debate about cannabis and Jim Anderton was there in the debate, and I realised that the people on both sides of the debate were blind and were not willing at all to compromise or open their minds to other possibilities. what's the point really? government is going to do what they want wether we want it or not. and this whole issue with the tax cuts; everyone is going to get an extra $20 or something extra a week. big deal, where is that money coming from? why do people actually think so selfishly when they vote? I'd personally be happy with more taxes if it improved our health care and education systems. but that's not going to happen because most of the public are financial retards and don't care at all about thinking forward
it was almost a revelation, although it was obvious, when I realised that the christian religion is based entirely on what the bible says. if the bible said something different then it would change doctrine. so I thought I'd better go and check the validity, and not through theological sources but historical ones. this went on for a while, I didn't want to make any quick decisions or anything, but the more I meta-researched it the more holes I found, the more inconsistancies. I'm currently watching a set of lectures from Yale University about the hebrew bible, and it's very interesting, just how almost everything in the start of the hebrew bible (similar to the christian old testament) isn't original but all the near east cultures had the same stories, floods etc. the only difference being that the hebrews were monotheistic not polytheistic. there's also no mention of the afterlife at all in the hebrew bible, and the word religion doesn't exist in their language either, because to the hebrews, it wasn't a religion, it was just their culture. if someone joined their culture they followed their laws. and considering the new testament is based on this, well, how can this be? it's folklore. for a long time I've been disappointed with the answers I've had from the church regarding aspects of faith and the bible, and that makes sense because to rationalise cognitive dissonance requires some pretty unbelievable stories. so the end point is that I can't call myself a Christian anymore, the text the faith is built on is so flawed, never mind all the moral issues I had with it.
it's good to have our cat biscuit back with us, the landlord let us despite a no animal clause, but it's good, although sometimes she is very demanding of attention and tries her hardest to get in the way of everything you do.
I wonder if anyone will read this?